Tag Archives: mortgage

Rule to Grow Rich By #2: Refinancing Your Home

This is part two of a series where we’ll be looking at the real estate-related rules in Money Magazine’s “25 Rules To Grow Rich By”. We’ll be taking these rules one-by-one and going in-depth as to whether it’s a rule “to grow rich by” or not. Take a look at the rules we’ve covered at the 25 Rules list.

Rule 2: It’s worth refinancing your mortgage when you can cut your interest rate by at least one point.

I agree with the premise of this rule – it’s usually a good idea to refinance your mortgage loan if you have a chance to cut interest. Especially if you’re early in the life of the loan a 1% drop in your interest really adds up over the course of the loan.

Did you know that the overall percentage of the average homeowner’s income that goes to pay their mortgage has risen 12.6% from ten years ago? That can leave many people scrambling for some sort of relief – a refinance may be a way to do so.

The Reasons Why People Refinance

Mortgage Refinance | What options do owners have?

If you’re looking to refinance, there are many other reasons why you might be considering doing so. For example, you might be under an adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) – which I usually do not recommend for homeowners – and switch over to a fixed rate mortage. You might want to reduce your monthly debt load by rolling your unsecured debt into your mortgage as a temporary fix to your credit situation. You may want to refinance your mortgage into a shorter term – this allows you to pay off your loan faster and build your equity quicker. For example, you might want to take your 30 year mortgage and drop it down to a 20 year loan or even a 15 year loan.

By dropping your loan in terms of total years, you’re really getting a handle on your mortgage. Dropping your mortgage down by a percentage point may often not make a very big difference in the long run in the total mortgage interest you’ll pay in general. But if you get a short term mortgage, especially combined with the lower interest, this will really make a big dent in the interest you’ll be paying over the life of the loan.

What You Need to Know About Mortgage Refinance

There are some hidden costs you need to be aware of when refinancing your mortgage. You’ll have to pay lender fees, which can include points, origination, credit report, application, and appraisal. You may have to pay third-party fees – these vary by state and mortgage company and can include title exam, title insurance, closing, and recording. These closing costs can range from 2% to 3% of your loan amount.

To put it blunty, if you make a mortgage refinance decision, you do it for the long term. It must benefit you over the long haul – it must make sense in this future view context! If you think you might be moving relatively soon, then just stop thinking about refinancing your mortgage. Be aware of what’s out there and don’t get suckered into many of these no cost refinance advertisements you may see on television and get into a bad mortgage refinance decision that can cost you money, time, and major headaches down the line.

As for the topic of refinancing your home to pay off credit card debt, I’d recommend you stay away from this course of action for the most part. Statistics show that more than 85% of people who refinanced to pay off their credit card debt return to the same level of credit card indebtedness within 2 years. Don’t fall into that credit card debt cycle.

This is just such a complex and important subject it’s very hard to recommend any course of action as a blanket path for everyone to take in this situation. You really need to take into account your particular situation, learn what you can about the refinancing process, get yourself a reputable professional that can assist you and then it’s time for you to make your decision.

Revised Rule #2: Refinancing your mortgage is a viable solution if you focus on the long-term and are able to save yourself money in the way that makes sense to you.

Jump Back to Rule #1 | 25 Rules | Jump Forward to Rule #3

Real Estate Investing: Alternate Methods

From Illinois Business Law Journal:

I. Introduction

The traditional real estate investment strategy of “flipping” properties, while potentially quite lucrative, has several shortcomings, especially for small-scale investors. Alternative models that allow for investment in portions of a property may offer more flexibility to investors. A particually interesting alternative could be the option to invest in an occupant’s debt through an equity re-sale agreement would offer further flexibility to investors preferring steady returns to potential sporadic payoffs.

II. Background

The real estate market has long been recognized as a source of investment opportunities. Although there is some debate on the issue of which is better, it seems that historically real estate investments bear returns at approximately the same rate as stock investments. Additionally, the real estate market offers these advantages without the degree of risk inherent in investments in stock.

The traditional model for investing, however, is fairly limited, generally involving the acquisition of properties in the hope that they will appreciate and be resalable at a profit. This model, while viable in certain situations, is, for several reasons, fairly restrictive in scope. First, although there are always attempts to avoid the necessity of starting capital, this model greatly favors those individuals with substantial funds available for initial investment. Second, this model requires the concentration of risks in certain properties. Third, this model is only viable in a bull market.

II. Discussion

An alternative model of real estate investing could allow individuals to purchase portions, much like shares, of a property rather than the entire parcel. This method could take at least two forms, each of which would alleviate much of the restrictions inherent in traditional real estate investing discussed above.

In one form, investors could simply purchase a certain percentage of a property, as they would purchase a certain percentage of ownership in a company through stock purchase. This percentage could be retained or resold at an adjusted rate dictated by market forces of supply and demand. This model would reduce the first two restrictions imposed by the traditional model of investment by reducing the amount of initial capital necessary to invest and allowing for the diversification of risk over a greater number of properties. As in the traditional model, however, absolute profits could only be realized in a bull market.

A second, more deviant, form of investing in portions of a property interest could allow investors to purchase portions of an owner’s debt. That is, investors could extend a loan, much like a mortgage, to a prospective purchaser in exchange for an agreed upon interest rate. As in the former model, investors would own a share of the property. Instead of waiting for it to appreciate before selling, however, they would gradually sell it back to the occupant at a specified rate of interest. Instead of potential windfall profits, this option would offer a steady stream of income at a given rate. Additionally, as investors would have an equity interest in the property until the loan was paid off, a default would not result in heavy losses.

If an investor wished to withdraw their money, they could resell their share of the debt to another investor at the same or a different interest rate. Interest rates could be set through an auction system facilitated by a third party (such as a web site) who would keep a small share of the proceeds from each transaction. Such formats already exist. Adapting such a format to real estate loans would be relatively simple. Transacting deals over the internet would allow investors a wide geographic range of properties.

In addition to offering investment opportunities for lenders, diversifying the home finance market into the hands of a large group of individuals rather than a few large companies could help avert the financial havoc caused by mishaps such as the recent subprime collapse.

V. Conclusion

Greater flexibility in real estate investment options would allow investors to choose those opportunities best suited to their individual situations and objectives. Exploration in to the provision of such options, like those discussed above, seems worthwhile. Whether such investments would be preferable to traditionally available options in the long-term would be determined by market forces. Perhaps the surest winners would be those who facilitated such investments. Through the use the internet, this could be done with little overhead and assured commission profits on each transaction.